<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beyond PageRank sculpting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/</link>
	<description>SEO Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:04:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PageRank sculpting: Matt Cutts expected to post soon</title>
		<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>PageRank sculpting: Matt Cutts expected to post soon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everfluxx.com/?p=193#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] last week&#8217;s turmoil following Matt Cutts&#8217; announcement at SMX Advanced of an important change in how Google handles the rel=nofollow attribute as far as the distribution of internal PageR... (I think that&#8217;s the longest anchor I&#8217;ve ever written  ), things in the SEOsphere have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last week&#8217;s turmoil following Matt Cutts&#8217; announcement at SMX Advanced of an important change in how Google handles the rel=nofollow attribute as far as the distribution of internal PageR&#8230; (I think that&#8217;s the longest anchor I&#8217;ve ever written  ), things in the SEOsphere have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everfluxx</title>
		<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Everfluxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everfluxx.com/?p=193#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hi Shari, many thanks for joining the discussion!

Needless to say, I totally agree with you on the importance of information architecture design. Too bad that many SEOs don&#039;t even take it into account as a key step of on-site optimization, and prefer adopting cheap tactics (that&#039;s why they&#039;re so worried about PR sculpting now, eheh).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shari, many thanks for joining the discussion!</p>
<p>Needless to say, I totally agree with you on the importance of information architecture design. Too bad that many SEOs don&#8217;t even take it into account as a key step of on-site optimization, and prefer adopting cheap tactics (that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re so worried about PR sculpting now, eheh).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shari Thurow</title>
		<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Shari Thurow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everfluxx.com/?p=193#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hi there-

Yeah, I knew this would happen. I am not the only SEO who warned against the sculpting tactic. Mikkel deMib Svendsen warned against it as well back in October 2007 with me at an SMX conference. He who laughs last ....

I disagree that &quot;Information Architecture is the real SEO future...Maybe in 4-5 years.&quot; Wow. I think that is a completely ignorant statement. Information architecture has ALWAYS been a key component of search engine optimization. 

Don&#039;t wait 4-5 years. Please. And, BTW, information architects are objective, take classes (there are degree programs, usually in Library and Information Sciences), and construct architectures based on usability tests, among other things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there-</p>
<p>Yeah, I knew this would happen. I am not the only SEO who warned against the sculpting tactic. Mikkel deMib Svendsen warned against it as well back in October 2007 with me at an SMX conference. He who laughs last &#8230;.</p>
<p>I disagree that &#8220;Information Architecture is the real SEO future&#8230;Maybe in 4-5 years.&#8221; Wow. I think that is a completely ignorant statement. Information architecture has ALWAYS been a key component of search engine optimization. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t wait 4-5 years. Please. And, BTW, information architects are objective, take classes (there are degree programs, usually in Library and Information Sciences), and construct architectures based on usability tests, among other things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google confirms: nofollow won&#8217;t help flow more PR to your other links</title>
		<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Google confirms: nofollow won&#8217;t help flow more PR to your other links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everfluxx.com/?p=193#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...] Cutts was heard saying at SMX Advanced on May 28 about the &#8220;rel=nofollow&#8221; attribute and PageRank sculpting: nofollowing links won&#8217;t affect the amount of PR that flows to the remaining [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cutts was heard saying at SMX Advanced on May 28 about the &#8220;rel=nofollow&#8221; attribute and PageRank sculpting: nofollowing links won&#8217;t affect the amount of PR that flows to the remaining [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everfluxx</title>
		<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Everfluxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everfluxx.com/?p=193#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Another member of Google&#039;s team noted that PageRank sculpting on unimportant pages like &quot;register,&quot; &quot;login,&quot; &quot;privacy policy,&quot; etc. is OK and shouldn&#039;t hurt your site.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/no-clarification-forthcoming-from-google-on-nofollow-pagerank-flow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Another member of Google&#8217;s team noted that PageRank sculpting on unimportant pages like &#8220;register,&#8221; &#8220;login,&#8221; &#8220;privacy policy,&#8221; etc. is OK and shouldn&#8217;t hurt your site.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/no-clarification-forthcoming-from-google-on-nofollow-pagerank-flow" rel="nofollow">http://www.seomoz.org/blog/no-clarification-forthcoming-from-google-on-nofollow-pagerank-flow</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Vit</title>
		<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Vit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everfluxx.com/?p=193#comment-17</guid>
		<description>And what about &quot;Privacy&quot; or &quot;Term and conditions&quot; footer links? :-D
These are two links tipically placed in homepage...
In this case, even if you have a good information architecture, you lose some pieces of good Page Rank.
I agree with u: Information Architecture is real SEO future...Maybe in 4-5 years :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about &#8220;Privacy&#8221; or &#8220;Term and conditions&#8221; footer links? <img src='http://www.everfluxx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
These are two links tipically placed in homepage&#8230;<br />
In this case, even if you have a good information architecture, you lose some pieces of good Page Rank.<br />
I agree with u: Information Architecture is real SEO future&#8230;Maybe in 4-5 years <img src='http://www.everfluxx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everfluxx</title>
		<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Everfluxx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 07:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everfluxx.com/?p=193#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Yeah right. Plus it&#039;s really hard to &quot;hide&quot; links from Google, as we know. Sometimes the only winning move is not to link at all. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah right. Plus it&#8217;s really hard to &#8220;hide&#8221; links from Google, as we know. Sometimes the only winning move is not to link at all. <img src='http://www.everfluxx.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrico Altavilla</title>
		<link>http://www.everfluxx.com/beyond-pagerank-sculpting/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrico Altavilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.everfluxx.com/?p=193#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Hi Jack. What about a post about the &quot;we follow JS links now&quot; statement by Google?

It reminds me of the good old meme &quot;Security through obscurity does not work&quot; (forever, that is).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jack. What about a post about the &#8220;we follow JS links now&#8221; statement by Google?</p>
<p>It reminds me of the good old meme &#8220;Security through obscurity does not work&#8221; (forever, that is).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
